Day-2: Five Days Certified Training Program On Mediation In Collaboration With Aiimas

Event Date: 28 Jan 2026

Event brief description

The second day of the second batch of the Five-Day Certified Training Programme on Mediation was conducted on 28 January 2026. The programme commenced with a brief recap of the previous day’s sessions by Ms. Nagina Jain, highlighting the core concepts and learnings discussed earlier. Subsequently, Ms. Jain elaborated on the concept and meaning of mediation, followed by a detailed explanation of the mediation process. She emphasised that mediation does not act as a bar to litigation or other modes of dispute resolution, but rather serves as an effective alternative mechanism. The session further focused on the advantages of mediation over litigation, including its cost-effectiveness, confidentiality, flexibility, and time efficiency. The various stages of the mediation process were also discussed in detail.

In the subsequent session, Ms. Jaya Goyal explained the procedural aspects of mediation and elaborated on the respective roles and responsibilities of the mediator and the parties involved. The second session featured an interactive role-play exercise, wherein participants were divided into four groups and assigned a case study titled Sunita v. Ram Chander and Others. Post role-play, key observations were discussed, and constructive feedback was provided by the trainers. The day concluded with Ms. Nagina Jain explaining the final phase of mediation, focusing on the drafting and significance of the settlement agreement.

Event Detailed Description

The second day of the Five-Day Certified Training Programme on Mediation, organised by the School of Law, Galgotias University in collaboration with the All India Institute of Mediation and Arbitration Studies (AIIMAS), was conducted on 28 January 2026 with active participation and enthusiasm from the faculty members. The sessions for the day were thoughtfully designed to deepen participants’ conceptual understanding of mediation while simultaneously introducing them to its practical dimensions.

The programme commenced with Ms. Nagina Jain revisiting the key discussions from the previous day. Through this recap, she reinforced foundational concepts and provided continuity to the learning process. She then proceeded to explain the meaning and nature of mediation, emphasising its consensual and party-centric character. Ms. Jain elaborated on the core principles governing mediation, including recognition of party autonomy, the right of self-determination, confidentiality, neutrality, and impartiality. She clarified that mediation is not a bar to litigation or arbitration, nor does it result in a waste of time or resources if unsuccessful. Instead, mediation complements formal adjudicatory mechanisms by offering an effective and amicable platform for dispute resolution. Further, Ms. Jain drew a comparative distinction between trial-based adjudication and mediation, highlighting differences in procedure, cost, time, flexibility, and outcomes. She underscored the advantages of mediation, such as flexibility in process, confidentiality of proceedings, creative problem solving, and preservation of relationships. She also emphasised that mediation outcomes are voluntary in nature and often more effective than imposed compromises, as parties arrive at mutually acceptable solutions.

The session then focused on the role and functions of the mediator. Ms. Jain explained that a mediator acts as a neutral facilitator rather than a decision-maker and assists the parties in identifying issues, exploring interests, and arriving at a consensual agreement. This was followed by a session led by Ms. Jaya Goyal, who elaborated on the procedural aspects of mediation and the distinct roles and responsibilities of the mediator and the parties involved. She explained the functional stages of mediation and highlighted the importance of establishing neutrality, building trust, and creating a conducive environment for dialogue. Ms. Goyal further explained the procedural framework of mediation, including joint sessions and individual or private sessions, and, where necessary, sub-sessions with parties. She highlighted the importance of setting ground rules at the outset and clearly communicating the mediator’s role to the parties to ensure transparency and effectiveness throughout the process.

The second half of the day featured an engaging role-play exercise, wherein participants were divided into four groups and assigned a case study titled Sunita v. Ram Chander and Others. The role-play provided participants with hands-on exposure to mediation dynamics and practical challenges. Following the exercise, key observations were discussed, and the trainers offered constructive feedback, focusing on mediation techniques, communication strategies, and ethical considerations.

Subsequently, Ms. Nagina Jain explained the settlement procedure, which constitutes the final phase of mediation. She emphasised that the settlement agreement must be reduced to writing, clearly addressing all identified issues and outlining the future relationship between the parties. The session concluded with Ms. Jaya Goyal highlighting the importance of effective communication skills in mediation and how strategic communication can facilitate successful outcomes.

The day concluded with an interactive evening session that provided participants with a comprehensive understanding of mediation practice, effectively setting the stage for the upcoming days of intensive training, advanced role-plays, and skill-building exercises aimed at preparing participants to function as competent mediators in real-life disputes.

Department Name –School of Law

Event Outcome 

The Five Days Certified Training Program on Mediation successfully enhanced participants’ understanding of mediation as a vital tool for conflict resolution. Participants gained practical insights into communication, negotiation, and problem-solving through interactive discussions and case studies. The sessions equipped them with the ability to identify conflicts, manage emotions, and facilitate constructive dialogue between disputing parties. The program fostered a deeper appreciation of mediation’s role in reducing court burdens and promoting restorative justice. Participants left with enhanced confidence, ethical awareness, and transferable skills applicable not only in legal practice but also in professional and personal life situations.

Related Goal